The focus of chapter 2 was very interesting to me because I had
never heard of the concept of the concentric circles in regards to explaining the
English language. The author indicated
that the inner circle entailed students who spoke English as their primary
language, the outer circle was made up of those who spoke it as their second
language in a multilingual context and lastly the expanding circle which was
made up of those who studied English as a foreign language. The author also pointed out that although
this diagram helps understand the different levels of acquisition, it does not
address any type of variation. For
example, the book mentions the African American vernacular to be one of the
variants that the system does not include which we previously determined as a
class that it should be addressed as a separate dialect of the English
language. This exclusion of the dialects
makes it a questionable diagram especially for those minority language groups
that were not included.
I also found the comparison of the ELL classes in the United
States and those from Britain to be fascinating. It is interesting to think that two countries
with the same native language to run their systems completely differently. In Britain they do not pull students out of
regular classes even if they need more instruction on the language because they
argue that it causes cultural isolation and segregation. The United States systems however do not
address cultural isolation thus they encourage providing the extra guidance to
ELs so that they do not drown away amongst their native speaking peers. These ideas were then followed by the analysis
of the Lau vs Nichols supreme court
decision which debated the “discriminatory intent versus the discriminatory
impact”. They found that language
development must occur before being placed in class which in my opinion makes
the most sense. When foreigners enter
this country for the first time barely knowing the language, it can be an
extremely overwhelming experience and if they were to be placed in classes
where they don’t understand it can only lead to making manners worse. For example, a new student entered my middle
school from Russia but knew very little English. He was placed among English speaking peers
and did poorly in math until he was placed in an ELL class where we later found
out he was a math whiz and joined the school’s mathlete team. Examples like this are perfect evidence of
how important it is to be giving students the extra help they need before
throwing them into the water with no life vest hoping they can swim. Of course the ideas of student motivation and
teacher competence are both important factors that were also addressed in this
section, but I really think that the idea of EL classrooms and its benefits out
way the possible cultural isolation or segregation that may or may not appear.
The chapters also mentioned the term diglossia which I was
unaware of before reading this section.
It is really interesting to think that there are communities that
language varieties are important because they play different roles in
society. After analyzing this idea more I
can understand better and even see examples in my own community that I hadn’t
previously noticed.
No comments:
Post a Comment